Last modified: 2010-05-28 by rob raeside
Keywords: royal standard | united kingdom | queen elizabeth ii |
Links: FOTW homepage | search | disclaimer and copyright | write us | mirrors
The version of the British Royal Arms in which the Lion Rampant banner of Scotland is in the first and fourth quarters of the shield (with the English banner in the second, and the Irish harp, as is normal, in the third) is widely seen in Scotland and it is in fact the Royal Standard within Scotland (as opposed to the Royal Standard of Scotland,). The United Kingdom actually has two different achievements of Royal Arms:
Northern Ireland uses the English Royal Arms, but with the Irish Royal Crest, which is a hart exiting a tower. [Note that the crest would have no bearing on the design of the standard/banner. The crest would appear only above the helmet on the coat of arms, while the standard/banner is made up of the design on the shield itself. - Joe McMillan, 18 October 2004]
Of course these flags should only be used by the Queen. Incidentally, the other members of the Royal Family, whose arms and banners are the Royal Arms with labels of cadency, use the English version in Scotland - only the Queen uses the Scots version. There is one exception: the Prince of Wales has a distinctive personal flag for use in Scotland, being a banner of the arms for his Dukedom of Rothesay and Lordship of the Isles.
Why do we have two versions of the Royal Arms? Simply that when England and Scotland united in 1707, the Scots retained their distinctive legal system, complete with their own heraldic authority, the Lord Lyon King of Arms, quite separate from the College of Arms in London, whose writ does not run north of the border. Consequently each jurisdiction has its own version of the Arms, with its particular local heraldic flavour.
Roy Stilling, 6 May 1996
Variations of the Royal Standard as personal banners of members of the royal family
(see below) are a relatively recent phenomena. Until Edward VII changed the way in which the Royal Standard
was used, most other members of the royal family used the Royal Standard
David Prothero, 7 May 2002
Who designed the Royal Standard in its current form?
The Royal Standard which is a banner of the Royal Arms is an heraldic arrangement of the Arms of England, Scotland and Ireland. They were put together in their present form in 1801. At that time there was an additional shield in the centre of the standard representing Hanover, but it was removed in 1837. The particular style of the present Royal Standard dates from 1957 when Sir George Rothe Bellew, Garter King of Arms, revised the design. It may have been done by him, or by one of the Heralds at the College of Arms.
David Prothero, 30 March 2007
Which standard is used by the Queen as sovereign of the crown dependencies
Jersey, Guernsey and Isle of Man?
This isn't a definitive answer, but the two bailiwicks of the Channel Islands are dependencies of the English Crown ("1066 and All That"), so I can't believe it would be anything other the English version of the standard. And I'm pretty sure that Man's dependency is either on the Crown of England or else the Crown of the U.K., so, again, the 'default' English version would apply.
André Coutanche, 30 March 2007
image by Martin Grieve, 2 April 2007
based on illustrations in F.E. Hulme's 'Flags of the World' c1895 and Benjamin Edgington's Empire Calendar c1898
The Royal Standard in its present general arrangement dates from 1801 when the French quarter (2) became Scottish, the Anglo-Scottish quarter (1) and the Hanoverian quarter (4) became English, and Hanover became an escutcheon of pretence. Changes were made in 1816 when the Electoral Bonnet ensigning Hanover was replaced by a Royal Crown, and on Queen Victoria's accession to the throne in 1837 when the ensigned escutcheon of Hanover was removed. In 1901 a Parliamentary Counsellor suggested that these alterations were not done in accordance with constitutional rules. Under Article One of the Union with Ireland Act, 1800, the flags and banners of the newly created United Kingdom were to be appointed by Royal Proclamation. The Law Officer wrote, "It is a well known constitutional rule that where a power is granted by Parliament to the Crown, that power is exhausted by its first exercise. In accordance with this constitutional rule the various alterations or additions which have been made to the Royal style and title have always been authorised by special legislation (eg. 39 & 40 Vict. c.10, and 1 Edw.7. c.15). It appears to me that any alteration of the Royal Standard, on which the Royal Arms are blazoned, would require similar legislation." He was referring to a proposed alteration which did not take place, but his opinion would seem to be equally applicable to those alterations of 1816 and 1837.
The 1816 alteration was by Royal Proclamation of 8 June, announced in the London
Gazette on 29 June and, according to Cumberland Clark in Flags of Britain,
(1934), that of 1837 by Royal Warrant. [National Archives (PRO) HO
David Prothero, 2 April 2007
image by Martin Grieve, 3 April 2007
As with any Arms, representations of the Royal Arms do not all have to be
identical, providing that they correspond with the blazon of the Arms, and
conform to heraldic practice. Similarly the Royal Standard, which is a banner of
the Royal Arms, does not have to exactly copy the Arms. Some changes have become
established features. In 1906 Sir Alfred Scott-Gatty, Garter King of Arms,
criticised the appearance of the Royal Standard and offered to correct and
improve its design, pointing out that the "lions of England and Scotland ought
to be armed and langued azure". The charges were redrawn and enlarged, and the
lions given blue claws and tongues.
[National Archives (PRO) ADM 116/1063C]
David Prothero, 3 April 2007
image by Martin Grieve, 4 April 2007
In about 1937 the colour red on the Standard was changed from red (T818A) to
crimson (T816). [National Archives (PRO) ADM 1/9163]
David Prothero, 4 April 2007
"Das Grosse Flaggenbuch (1939)" re-print
shows the red unchanged on plate II, but seems to reflect the 1937 alteration to
crimson on the next page. Campbell and
Evans (1965) "Book of Flags"
appear to be reluctant to
acknowledge the more contemporary artwork of "Flags
of All Nations (BR20)" (1957) and copies Flaggenbuch instead. Just about every aspect of
Great Britain's Royal Standard had altered and yet a British publication 8
years later could not report the facts to the general public accurately.
Or so it would appear.
Martin Grieve, 6 April 2007
image by Martin Grieve, 5 April 2007
The harp appears in two different forms. On the Arms it is often a plain Gaelic
harp, which fits more neatly into the triangular space on the shield, but on the
Standard the frame of the harp is usually in the shape of a winged-female. In
1954 the Queen had expressed a preference for the Gaelic harp, and it was
assumed that this style of harp would appear on all future Royal Standards. The
1956 edition of Flags of the World by H.Gresham Carr noted this and had black
and white drawings of both harps, while on the coloured illustration of the
Royal Standard the harp was changed from winged-female to Gaelic. Somewhat
surprisingly, when a revised Standard was introduced a year later, it had a
winged-female harp. However some Gaelic harp Standards were made.
Undated photographs show a car flag, and a Standard flying at Windsor Castle, each with a Gaelic harp. The style of the Scottish quarter and the bright yellow colour suggest that they were made in 1957 or later. [National Archives (PRO) WORK 21/214]
David Prothero, 5 April 2007
A Gaelic harp was seen on the extra large Royal Standard flying over Buckingham
Palace to-day (16 June) for the Official Birthday of HM the Queen.
David Prothero, 16 June 2007
image by Martin Grieve, 7 April 2007
In February 1957 Garter submitted a new version of the Royal Standard. It was
approved by the Queen in July. The harp was a winged-female, but the lower half
of the forepillar was the same as that usually seen on the Gaelic harp, rather
than the elaborate swirls of the traditional winged-female harp. The tail of the
Scottish lion was simplified, and four additional flowers added to a widened
tressure. The already elongated English lions were stretched even further. In
general the changes appear to have been made to follow the heraldic principle
that a charge should cover as much of its field as possible, though the new
winged-female harp is smaller than previous winged-female harps. It was probably
at this time that bright yellow replaced the previous dull yellow.
[National Archives (PRO) WORK 21/214]
David Prothero, 7 April 2007
On the Royal Arms and Standards the only harp that I have seen, that is not
Gaelic or winged-female, is the harp on the Arms of the Stuart Kings. It had the
head of a beast and no wings. The head does not look much like a lion and is
possibly meant to represent the onchu, a mythical Irish beast.
David Prothero, 5 April 2007
This version of the harp is shown for James I (England/France, Scotland,
Ireland, England/France) and for William III
(same, but square overall and with Orange inestucheon). The beast almost seems
to have a bear's face, facing the viewer, with three proturberances below,
almost like a female human's breasts, each lower than the other.
Nathan Lamm, 6 April 2007
Gerald Hayes-McCoy in his book 'A History of Irish flags from Earliest Times', p46, comments as follows:
"The earliest representation of the symbolic harp - as on Henry VIII's coins and his immediate successors - show the instrument with a plain forepillar. By the seventeenth century, the top of the pillar, where the neck joins it, is frequently shown to terminate in a grotesque head, the head of a beast resembling perhaps a dog or a fish. Such a head appears on the harp figured in the coinage of James I and Charles I. It appears again on the harp shown on a herald's tabard of 1677-86. One hesitates to suggest that the beast so represented is a reincarnation of the mysterious onchu. Meanwhile, from at least the the second quarter of the century forward, the head is shown in some of the harp symbols as that of a human female figure."Unfortunately, he leaves the onchu there and provides no further explanation of what this mysterious beast was supposed to be. But then it wouldn't be a
image located by David Prothero, 6 April 2007
Concerning the onchu, this image is the
harp on the Royal Arms which form the tabard of Sir William Dugdale, who was
Garter King of Arms from 1677 to 1686 (from photograph Fig.14 in 'Complete
Guide to Heraldry' by A.C. Fox-Davies).
Hayes-McCoy makes other vague, very uncertain references to the onchu. The
word has also been translated as "standard, ensign or flag", and there may be
some connection with the Dragon Standard of Wessex which was Harold's standard
at the battle of Hastings.
David Prothero, 6 April 2007
When Queen Victoria, King
Edward VII and
King George V died, one Royal Standard was flown at full-mast by the succeeding
Sovereign, and a second Royal Standard was flown at half-mast for the former
Sovereign until the day of the funeral. When King George
VI died in 1952, a
Royal Standard was flown at full-mast for Queen
Elizabeth II, but the expected
Royal Standard was not flown at half-mast on Victoria Tower while the former
King's body lay-in-state in Westminster Hall. The official explanation for this
new practice was that since the Crown is never extinct the Royal Standard should
never be half-masted.
The same new practice was adopted when Queen Mary, wife of the late King George V, died in 1953. Her personal standard was struck and not flown at half-mast, although in 1925 the personal standard of Queen Alexandra, wife of the late King Edward VII was flown at half-mast from her death until the day of her funeral. In this case Garter, King of Arms, Sir George Bellew, contended that the dead could not fly flags, half-masted or otherwise.
[Mariner's Mirror, August 1953, and February 1954]
David Prothero, 8 April 2007